Issue No. 063 · Story 01 · October 9, 2026
CopyrightPharrell Seeks Dismissal of Chad Hugo's Copyright Claims
Pharrell Williams and Talamasca asked a Los Angeles federal court to dismiss Chad Hugo's copyright claims in the dispute between the longtime Neptunes collaborators. Their October 6 motion argues that Hugo's second amended complaint does not adequately identify the works he claims to co-own or distinguish rights in musical compositions from rights in sound recordings. The filing seeks dismissal of the federal claims and, if they fall, dismissal without prejudice of the remaining state-law claims.
- §Hugo alleges that his writing, production and performance contributions entitle him to ownership interests and an accounting of earnings from their musical partnership. His claims include rights associated with The Neptunes and N.E.R.D.
- §Williams argues that the latest pleading dropped eight previously named works and now identifies EarthGang's U Gotta without specifying the protected expression Hugo contributed or the particular copyright he claims.
- §The motion also argues that demands for producer credit and a co-owner's accounting do not independently establish a federal copyright claim. Alternatively, the defendants ask for a more definite statement rather than dismissal.
- §The filing notices a November 6 hearing before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. It is a request for relief, not a decision on Hugo's authorship or entitlement to payment.
THE TAKEAWAY
A musical composition and its sound recording carry separate copyrights. The Neptunes dispute now turns on which works Chad Hugo claims to co-own, what he contributed to them, and whether those allegations support federal jurisdiction. The motion seeks dismissal or a more definite statement, not a ruling that Pharrell owns every disputed work.
Same issue